Clinical extraction review PDF comparison workspace
Untitled review workspace
Files remain in this browser — no network connection is used
PDFNo PDF selected JSONNo JSON selected
Source PDFNo PDF selected

Bring in the source document

Select the original PDF to inspect it with your browser’s familiar page and zoom controls.

or drag and drop a PDF into this pane
Drop PDF to open
Extracted ContentNo JSON selected

Load the extracted content

The parsed output will be reorganized into familiar clinical documents, sections, findings, and results ready for verification.

or drag and drop a JSON file into this pane
Drop JSON to review
◆ Live review output

Review Result

The preview reflects the current browser workspace.

Reviewed byReviewer not set
Review completion0%

Page results

0 pages

Issues logged

0 issues
No source files loadedLive preview · current local workspace

Identify the reviewer

Both fields are required and will be included in saved and generated results.

This information stays in the local browser workspace and is written into exported review files.

Flag incorrect text

The exact fragment, JSON path, and your comment will be preserved in the review result.

Text annotations

Exact fragments marked incorrect during this review.

!

PDF content missing from JSON

Record clinically relevant content visible on the current PDF page but absent from the extracted content.

PDF page 1

Summarize what the extraction omitted and why it matters clinically.

Copy the wording from the PDF exactly when possible. Otherwise, attach a screenshot below.

Screenshot evidence
Paste a screenshot here Press Ctrl+V or Command+V, read an image from the clipboard, or upload JPG, PNG, or WebP files. Maximum 8 images, 12 MB each.

Review result generated

A ZIP package containing the structured JSON result and screenshot-evidence folders has been downloaded.